4 ms·

How do you explain Bell inequality violations without involving entanglement? If we get quantum computers working at a non-trivial scale, would you consider th

• trhway 12y ago
  >How do you explain Bell inequality violations without involving entanglement? i still can't in details :) I so far have worked my way only until double-slit experiments - no superposition there :) For Bell violations i bet we have the same mis-interpretation of statistical aggregate description as individual realization (this "mis-interpreation" is the Copenghagen's superposition) as in double-slits. In case of Bell violations experiments it seems to be the same as "disjoint sampling loophole" http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Loopholes_in_Bell_test_experiments#Disjoint_sampling" http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Loopholes_in_Bell_test_experime... >If we get quantum computers working at a non-trivial scale, would you consider that to be strong evidence for entanglement? it would be strong evidence for superposition and thus for entanglement. Want these computers like anybody else, yet don't really see them happening :(