3 ms·
> The collision of old and new ideals is clearest when it comes to the gnarly socioeconomics of collegiate education. The professors at the old university were,
by rgbrgb 12y ago
> The collision of old and new ideals is clearest when it comes to the gnarly socioeconomics of collegiate education. The professors at the old university were, with few exceptions, white, male, trained through direct lineage, and self-selected for an interest in the Western canon. The students at the élite schools were mostly patrician, also white and male, and, owing to these and other factors, not terribly anxious about their post-graduation circumstances. Deresiewicz is right that today’s college students are more risk-averse. That’s partly because there’s much more risk to be averse to. A Yalie of the Nick Carraway generation could afford to “stand outside the world for a few years,” as Deresiewicz puts it. It cost nothing: a Wall Street job awaited.
Today's idealism is often grounded in the realities of a generation past.
- kelukelugames 12y agoBooth did a survey to see how risk averse their students were. There was a giant gap between the white and non-white students. The question was: Imagine how it feels to lose a dollar. Now imagine winning x dollars. What does x have to be for the feelings to be equal. I think the median result was 2 for white students and a ridiculous number over 10 for Indians and Asians