>It would be interesting to see how quickly your attitude would change if you weren't wealthy and were living under a landlord such as yourself. It's funny bec

>It would be interesting to see how quickly your attitude would change if you weren't wealthy and were living under a landlord such as yourself. It's funny because I do live under a landlord such as myself, in a different city. I'm both a landlord and a tenant. >Any day, for any reason or no reason, your entire life can be turned upside down. You can be effectively made homeless and given a very limited amount of time to find a similar alternative place to live that may or may not exist and may or may no be close to your work (which matters when you're poor and cannot afford public transport). Sure, that would be inconvenient, but I'd get a reasonable amount of notice (60 days in any case where I haven't done anything wrong) which would be sufficient for me to line something else up. >I'm not referring to rent control: I am talking about privacy of the tenant (inspection notification periods, etc), notice for evictions (e.g. 30 days) Oh, so we're actually in agreement. I agree, there certainly needs to be notice if you feel like kicking your tenant out. That's just a matter of practicality.