"We know how to not cut down trees; we know how to not hunt animals to extinction; we know how to reduce our carbon emissions. The question isn’t one of possibi

"We know how to not cut down trees; we know how to not hunt animals to extinction; we know how to reduce our carbon emissions. The question isn’t one of possibility, but of desire and ethically arduous sacrifice." Do we now? Ignoring the idea that it's simpler to predict the economic, political, and ecological consequences of stopping large amounts of economic activity (which, the article should recognize, is the exact damn problem they're trying to avoid solving); how DO you actually convince all 7 billion people that it's in their best interests to stop doing things that will let them put food on their family's table? HINT: Non trivial problem.