3 ms·

I'd agree with Stewbrew. SocSci is PACKED with people trying to jam new theory into already crammed areas, because it's the only way they'll get on; although I

I'd agree with Stewbrew. SocSci is PACKED with people trying to jam new theory into already crammed areas, because it's the only way they'll get on; although I agree that the studies and experiments are based on sometimes fleeting assumptions or hypotheses, it isn't because of a lack of theory.

ExpiredLink 12y ago
> people trying to jam new theory into already crammed areas Those 'theories' are very limited in scope, ad-hock theories. Not theories in the meaning of "abstract or generalizing thinking" (Wikipedia).