> sn't this rather at odds with your hypothesis that they do well because of being more aggressive? I don't think that's what he said originally. He said that

> sn't this rather at odds with your hypothesis that they do well because of being more aggressive? I don't think that's what he said originally. He said that aggressive women are those who overcome the social pressure to not join a male dominated field like CS/tech. To give an extreme example, you can be a timid man and still join CS simply because there's no pressure against you doing so, but if you were a timid woman you wouldn't be able to overcome the poor atmosphere women in STS face.