3 ms·
Just because it's still being maintained does NOT mean it's not antiquated and does NOT mean it's a good use of taxpayer money.
by duaneb 12y ago
Just because it's still being maintained does NOT mean it's not antiquated and does NOT mean it's a good use of taxpayer money.
- walshemj 12y agoJust because its old tech doesn't mean its bad either - when one very large employer I used to work with turned off its old in house payroll system written in COBOL the second month of the new brought in system was a disaster 70% or so of the staff didn't get paid :-) I cant say more as I was sworn to secrecy but lets say some very stupid contract operators had a large part to play
- nahname 12y agoYou don't think it is possible that in the 30 years since the original system was written, things have become a little inane?
- walshemj 12y ago??inane?? WTF are you smoking mate PARIS the in house system was updated for 20+ years quite successfully never missing a run. And you do know that for serious HPC a lot of work Is still done in the venerable Fortran (look at job adverts for CERN) and yes people use Python for some of that now as well but the Libraries that do the heavy lifting are Fortran ones.
- duaneb 12y agoSure, but COBOL is also a huge maintenance cost compared to something written in, say, java, which has no end of somewhat versed developers.
- zimpenfish 12y agoThat rather depends on how competent those "no end of developers" are. From my experience of Perl+Ruby developers, I'd be amazed if even 1% of Java developers were good enough to migrate an existing system without catastrophic results. And those 1% are a) hard to find, b) very expensive and c) likely already tied up and hoarded like gold-egg laying geese.
- walshemj 12y agoYes if your one of the worlds largest users of IBM mainframes as this company is finding good Cobol programmers is not going to be hard.