2 ms·
Very interesting -- for my prior post, I had written another few paragraphs on the need for a public micropayments clearinghouse and how well it would support f
by hackuser 12y ago
Very interesting -- for my prior post, I had written another few paragraphs on the need for a public micropayments clearinghouse and how well it would support free-as-in-speech software and media, but then deleted them as veering too far off-topic. (I'm glad you posted yours.)
Why limit the clearinghouse to free content and techy interests? Why couldn't other publishers use it, especially those whose products are too cheap per unit to charge for them one at a time such as newspaper articles?
I see your ideas on that and on search (a very interesting idea) as ways Mozilla can leverage their very valuable asset, user trust. Essentially Firefox would morph into a client for many services. But we are getting very far ahead of reality ...
- walterbell 12y ago> Why limit the clearinghouse to free content and techy interests? Good point. There would be less need for donation analytics in that scenario. If it was expanded to "everyone", there would be many more stakeholders at the table, e.g. every payment company. It would be easier to prove the concepts in the underserved market of "free" software & content. > But we are getting very far ahead of reality ... It could be prototyped with a Firefox extension that bridges between the browser and a local (Py)QT WebKit app. Xapian does local search on Linux.