4 ms·
And I hope we won't have it (although I know they are working on it and it's on the roadmap, so I have no illusion). Given the number of tabs I have constantly
by Gmo 12y ago
And I hope we won't have it (although I know they are working on it and it's on the roadmap, so I have no illusion).
Given the number of tabs I have constantly open, I know that Chrome cannot handle it (I guess IE is the same here) and a multiprocess firefox won't either.
- ewoodrich 12y agoHow many tabs are you talking about? I've used Chrome with 100+ tabs spread out over a few windows on 8gb of RAM with very few problems. Firefox on the other hand, chokes much earlier than Chrome.
- Gmo 12y agoTo be honest, I did not experience it first hand myself, because I've read this behaviour from many other people. What I know is that I have more than 300 tabs in Firefox currently, both on my home machine and my work machine, and I don't have any problems with it. Edit: And I would add that my task manager is also not polluted with hundreds of chrome processes.
- smt88 12y agoThere are extensions or settings in most browsers that will lazy-load tabs for you. No transfer or rendering occurs until you open the tab. That aside, what could possibly require opening 300 tabs? That must be an absolute productivity killer... Why not use a bookmark manager or "read later" service or something?
- ewoodrich 12y agoI don't know what would need 300, but if I'm in the middle of working on a project, I might [open link in new tab] dozens of tutorials, docs and other resources as I gradually become more familiar with the domain and the gaps in my knowledge. Sure, they should get pruned to bookmarks, but you can't argue if a person's method of staying in the "zone" works for them, I suppose.