3 ms·
>This author wants to ignore changing economic and political environments and go back to a time where corporations had near limitless power. Not really. Arguin
by tormeh 12y ago
>This author wants to ignore changing economic and political environments and go back to a time where corporations had near limitless power.
Not really. Arguing for a graspable set of laws - some countries' laws are entirely contained in a textbook-size book - is not arguing against accountability.
Having managers be responsible for some behavior sounds like a good idea to keep and even expand, though. Maybe Intel anti-competitive behavior wouldn't have been an issue if the Intel CEO knew that 10 years down the road he might be jailed. As it is, it is impossible to punish those who did the misdeeds. If robbing a bank is punishable by jailing, then gross corporate douchebaggery should also be likewise punishable.
- websitescenes 12y agoI am just getting to the root of the issue. This article reeks of political bias and motivation. This article isn't really talking about that. I tend to look at things in grand contexts and I can't ignore that aspect of this article.