When that opinion is different from your own, apparently it's "bias". Judging the agenda of a (very good, imho) publication (as if it could have one) based on

When that opinion is different from your own, apparently it's "bias". Judging the agenda of a (very good, imho) publication (as if it could have one) based on an op-ed is ridiculous. Where is the critical thought? The Economist has been around for 150 years, and if you felt like it you could find individual articles that would indicate any such "bias" you desired. Oh well.