3 ms·
Yes, that's true, it can't be done tomorrow, but I think it's the right approach. I'm not very familiar with Qt, but turning the more essential parts of it into
by tormeh 12y ago
Yes, that's true, it can't be done tomorrow, but I think it's the right approach. I'm not very familiar with Qt, but turning the more essential parts of it into a part of a LLVM standard library shouldn't take that many years, should it? And don't most standard libraries have networking now?
I'm curious how Microsoft killed Java. I assume you mean Java on the desktop?
- sp332 12y agoYeah, I mean "killed" specifically for writing web apps. And by "library" maybe I meant "runtime"? I mean you just have to send the HTML and JS to the client, and everything else for running the app is already there. I guess now, you could send a Python file written to use QT and it would work equivalently on many platforms.
- tormeh 12y agoAh, yeah, well, as long as Oracle is the steward of the most popular JVM I think we shouldn't let it run non-trusted code. I was thinking more desktop (non-web) apps, really.
- deleted 12y ago[deleted]