4 ms·
This can go one of two ways. 1) Let's be optimistic: this new CTO is an amazing person, super smart, will bring a lot of value to the company, and you will gro
by alain94040 12y ago
This can go one of two ways.
1) Let's be optimistic: this new CTO is an amazing person, super smart, will bring a lot of value to the company, and you will grow a lot by working with that person. So it's good.
2) The pessimistic view: this move was purely political, this new CTO is no one special, it's just one extra layer of management and taking your responsibilities away. You were doing a great job before, and now your job is made more complicated and less efficient.
Swallow your ego for a second and give that person a chance. If they perform really well, then admit it was the right move. If they are just average, then think of your next step. It doesn't mean quitting necessarily. It could just be that after a few months, it becomes clear that the CTO is not that great and your influence may be restored. Or maybe it's an opportunity for you to offload some of your current tasks and take on new parts of the company (get more involved in sales, or whatever else you are curious about).
- notahacker 12y agoThere's also option (2b) The new CTO is no-one special, but actually spends most of their time dealing with administrative bullshit related to the integration, leaving you more free to focus on managing your team and architecting ad-servers. Given the only context we've got is that the new CTO has no background in design decisions related to your problem domain or affiliation with any of the acquired companies but is an ex-company leader with the trust of the CEO, I'd even speculate that's the most likely outcome.