4 ms·
Each approach has a different challenge. For autonomous cars, the challenge is software. It's very difficult to build software that handles all the edge cases
by snowmaker 12y ago
Each approach has a different challenge.
For autonomous cars, the challenge is software. It's very difficult to build software that handles all the edge cases mentioned in the article. The hardware (cars) is a solved problem.
For autonomous personal flying machines, you're right that the software is easy, but the challenge is power density. The only VTOL machine that can carry humans a considerable distance without refueling is a helicopter. Helicopters are too large, disruptive, and expensive for everyone to have one. But no one has figured out how to shrink one down and still be able to carry a person.
If you compare the two approaches, one big difference is that software is improving much faster than power density. So my money would be that we solve the first one first.
- agildehaus 12y agoAlso, the software for autonomous flying machines would NOT be easy if suddenly we had tens of millions of them in the air.
- ASneakyFox 12y agoIf all flying cars had autopilot I don't think itd be that hard. They'd all follow the same autopilot guidlines. Ground cars will forever have to deal with the millions of "legacy" systems like lights, manual cars, stop signs, pedestrians. A flying car system would be totally networked from day one. Id imagine it being like the cars from the minority report.