3 ms·
Hey everyone, creators of pre-commit here. Thought it was a good idea to clarify what makes our project different from most other systems. Even thought pre-com
by struys 12y ago
Hey everyone, creators of pre-commit here. Thought it was a good idea to clarify what makes our project different from most other systems.
Even thought pre-commit is written in python we really don't care about the language that was used to write the hook/linter. If there's a good linter out there written in ruby, you should be able to use it and not have to install ruby/gems/etc. With pre-commit you just say you want scss-lint (https://github.com/causes/scss-lint https://github.com/causes/scss-lint) in your pre-commit config file and run pre-commit install. When you commit, pre-commit downloads, install scss-lint (without root) and runs the hook against the files you've changed.
Currently we support ruby, node and python and we definitely want to expand the system to support linters in other languages like Go, C/C++ and PHP. We'd really like to support all of these linters - https://github.com/showcases/clean-code-linters https://github.com/showcases/clean-code-linters.
Ken & Anthony
- icefox 12y agoSo pre-commit is just a package manager in disguise? To the extreme you could have a demo package where to build the demo you actually have to run git commit -m "world" and the pre-commit would install gcc and all of the dependencies and then run a build, letting the commit success if the build passes. ;D
- struys 12y agoIt's a weird form of a package manager yeah. The hooks execute independently from each other. We don't need requirements between the programming languages. In fact the hooks can even use different versions of the same programming language. If we have more usecases for this kind of programming, we could definitely pull just a package manager out of pre-commit.
- contingencies 12y agoGood job guys - I do think there's space for a broadly applicable solution in this space. The main selling points for a solution in this area, for us, are: (1) a strong remote registry implementation (available hooks, preferably auto-matched to auto-detected languages present, perhaps using file/libmagic and language syntax versioning); and (2) the ability to spec default behavior remotely in a company-wide registry, but then to override at two levels: that of checked in files within the repo, and .gitignore'd local developer-specific prefs. I'm definitely going to look at this further. To speed adoption, I'd encourage you to avoid assumptions around people's de-facto desire for all but the most basic levels of linting (iffy warnings, etc.), ie. make sure the defaults are very light touch ... but useful. Convenience is key. However, please don't encourage curl-based installs!
- struys 12y ago(1) We definitely thought about implementing a search/auto-suggest for pre-commit. We'd love help from the community to build a solution for that. You can follow/add ideas on the v2 label - https://github.com/pre-commit/pre-commit/issues/10 https://github.com/pre-commit/pre-commit/issues/10 For the time being our registry of available hooks is here: https://github.com/pre-commit/pre-commit.github.io/blob/real_master/all-repos.yaml https://github.com/pre-commit/pre-commit.github.io/blob/real.... We use that file to generate this page - http://pre-commit.com/hooks.html http://pre-commit.com/hooks.html. It's also available as json - http://pre-commit.com/all-hooks.json http://pre-commit.com/all-hooks.json. If you create new hooks for pre-commit we'd love to get a pull request to add to all-repos.yaml. It would be awesome to have `pre-commit search <keyword>` and `pre-commit add <hook-id>`. (2) I think we could integrate with yeoman generators to provide the company wide requirements. It's really hard to make assumptions about the structure of a repo, often just knowing extensions is not enough to identify file types (e.g. tests, auto generated code). Generally we leave it up to the developer, we don't want to enforce too much. We're definitely encouraging fixers over linters at Yelp. It's great to tell a developer "Hey you missed a semicolon" via jshint but it's much more useful to say "Hey you missed a semicolon, we fixed it and our change is unstaged, if you agree with our change add/commit" via fixmyjs. We'll be supporting fixmyjs really soon. We were blocked by https://github.com/jshint/fixmyjs/pull/99 https://github.com/jshint/fixmyjs/pull/99 and now we're just waiting for the next release. If you're a python developer using our autopep8-wrapper (found in this repo - https://github.com/pre-commit/pre-commit-hooks https://github.com/pre-commit/pre-commit-hooks) is really awesome. It fixes a lot of the simple pep8 issues.