There are two different costs here and that seems to be what's creating this moral dilemma. Cost 1= Building the website (coding, design...) Cost 2= Hosting t

There are two different costs here and that seems to be what's creating this moral dilemma. Cost 1= Building the website (coding, design...) Cost 2= Hosting the site and "stuff" Assuming that you want to make a "donation" to the NGO, Cost 1 is the donation. And, to be fair, that's really the expensive part of "the website." Cost 2, is what it takes to keep the site running, and those costs need to covered by the NGO. Or, if you left the NGO, you could stop paying for the hosting and poof the site is gone. Their site has to be their responsibility, otherwise it's just your site that they pretend is theirs.