>Breaking a bad law can be virtuous, but I suspect in this case it's neutral at best. It's not "breaking a bad law" that can be virtuous, it's the case. Sit-in

>Breaking a bad law can be virtuous, but I suspect in this case it's neutral at best. It's not "breaking a bad law" that can be virtuous, it's the case. Sit-ins are/were virtuous because the cause (civil rights) was just. The cause here is primarily "Uber and its investors want to make more money".