3 ms·
It's a bad law, but as people point out downthread, breaking a bad law is not in itself a good deed, it is simply a neutral one.
by serve_yay 12y ago
It's a bad law, but as people point out downthread, breaking a bad law is not in itself a good deed, it is simply a neutral one.
- jvoorhis 12y agoThat's a good soundbite, but I don't like it. Breaking a bad law can be virtuous, but I suspect in this case it's neutral at best.
- ZachPruckowski 12y ago>Breaking a bad law can be virtuous, but I suspect in this case it's neutral at best. It's not "breaking a bad law" that can be virtuous, it's the case. Sit-ins are/were virtuous because the cause (civil rights) was just. The cause here is primarily "Uber and its investors want to make more money".