4 ms·

Do they teach you to read the full article before commenting at Sococo?

• JoeAltmaier 12y ago
  What can that possibly mean? Of course I read it; they addressed a small fraction of the cases involved in P2P link negotiation. Ok, I re-read it, missed that sentence the 1st time. The guy does dismiss 'private' IP sharing as mentioned elsewhere in this thread. This has not been an issue with any enterprise client in our network. In fact, its a little weird to be consider sharing IP addresses a problem in a protocol designed to share IP addresses. Especially unroutable ones that can be guessed anyway (there are only 65535 192.168.x.x addresses). And NOT doing this makes some attempts fail, have worse latency, or worse yet NOW you're sharing your private traffic (voip? video? company IP?) over the PUBLIC internet. In fact several of our more careful customers explicitly demand that we route P2P traffic exclusively inside their firewall, and this is the feature that makes it work for them.