3 ms·
No, he did a great job of explaining that it's not one or the other, which is what the earlier comment quite blatantly made a claim of.
by forgingahead 12y ago
No, he did a great job of explaining that it's not one or the other, which is what the earlier comment quite blatantly made a claim of.
- bduerst 12y agoNo they didn't. They narrowly defined a word that has many definitions while demonstrating outrage at any other meaning. While they are technically correct in a textbook sense, their idea of a "True" free market has never existed in the context of this conversation, and it can be argued that price collusion between suppliers for a market is the natural result of free markets.