> So it's extremely unlikely that donating more will outweigh the impact of donating to the right charities. Sure, but that's orthogonal to the point I was try

> So it's extremely unlikely that donating more will outweigh the impact of donating to the right charities. Sure, but that's orthogonal to the point I was trying to make, which in the context of your comment could be summarized as "I see no reason to believe that charities which benefit from the involvement of the ultra-wealthy are guaranteed to be less effective than those which do not".