3 ms·
We used this back when I worked in Brazil. Liquibase is fine and solved some of our problems keeping schema migrations in sync across developers, but I remember
by why-el 12y ago
We used this back when I worked in Brazil. Liquibase is fine and solved some of our problems keeping schema migrations in sync across developers, but I remember it lacked some essential features such as syntax correction. I remember I wrote a couple of Ruby scripts to check things for me.
The catch phrase is unfortunate, because it could trick one to think this backs your data. This is basically a Rails migrations like solution that relies on XML files to describe changes to your schema.
Update: And now JSON even. Hoorray.
- elchief 12y agoYou can write your schema in the sql dialect of your choice. No xml required, cept one config file.