having a judicial activist issue a fiat. legislative process and in those states, In 2004, Karl Rove maneuvered "anti-marriage" amendments to voted on in many

having a judicial activist issue a fiat. legislative process and in those states, In 2004, Karl Rove maneuvered "anti-marriage" amendments to voted on in many states during the presidential election season. So, the republican establishment riled up all the religious nutters to vote both for bush and, while they were there, why not vote your bible faith to restrict rights for actual humans too? That's our legislative process—easily manipulatable, corruptible by riled up motivated voters who don't actually represent the majority. So, we fix wrong decisions of the people with checks and balances. We dissolve the tyranny of the many and restore balance to the force. suing because we don't recognize their polygamous marriages? there's no argument in favor of same sex marriage that doesn't equally apply to three or five person marriage. Doesn't seem unreasonable to me. Is there any downside to multi-marriage besides it just making you feel squicky?