3 ms·
One of the problems is that it's a terrible Lisp and runtime. If it was at least a Scheme, there would be less complaining. Also, Lisps aren't popular, as you s
by lucian1900 12y ago
One of the problems is that it's a terrible Lisp and runtime. If it was at least a Scheme, there would be less complaining. Also, Lisps aren't popular, as you surely know.
The display technology assumes a text terminal, just like vim. There are many things you can't do with that which are easy with a proper GUI.
- lispm 12y agoActually the Lisp runtime of GNU Emacs is not terrible. It's just that there are a few better in the Lisp world. Some of the things in Emacs Lisp are there by design. > The display technology assumes a text terminal, GNU Emacs and Xemacs have a lot of support for non-text-terminal displays.