Shouldn't the Paypal dispute be separate from the actual IP? OP said that in the event of non-payment the "property" stays with OP. Couldn't you argue that the

Shouldn't the Paypal dispute be separate from the actual IP? OP said that in the event of non-payment the "property" stays with OP. Couldn't you argue that the chargeback dispute was Paypal and not the Pigeonly guys? Or, couldn't you argue that the Pigeonly guys charging back themselves is an admission that they shouldn't have the IP?