4 ms·
I am just not surprised about this at all. They have more information than I could ever imagine, wouldn't any rational person assume there is a search engine to
by BorisMelnik 12y ago
I am just not surprised about this at all. They have more information than I could ever imagine, wouldn't any rational person assume there is a search engine to index, sort, parse, and return results?
seems like a lot until you consider how many indexed pages Google has:
http://i.imgur.com/EqIJAoL.jpg http://i.imgur.com/EqIJAoL.jpg
why not throw in grains of sand or atoms in the universe?
- Perseids 12y agoNice comparison, though I hate it when graphics look like they were drawn to scale, but actually aren't. (The Google indexed pages bar would have to be more than 10 times larger.) More on topic: Whether you can compare the index sizes or not mostly depends on their signal to noise ration. Given the number of Google search request per month and assuming and average of 5 viewed results, you can put a lower bound of 99% of pages that are never seen by anyone. As the search results should greatly overlap the actual number of relevant sites is probably orders of magnitude less than 1%.