3 ms·
That's not particularly big news in the article either (that IBM support Macs internally). See this article from 2012: http://www.cultofmac.com/144386/if-ibm-c
by whatusername 12y ago
That's not particularly big news in the article either (that IBM support Macs internally). See this article from 2012: http://www.cultofmac.com/144386/if-ibm-can-win-with-macs-and-ipads-in-business-why-cant-you/ http://www.cultofmac.com/144386/if-ibm-can-win-with-macs-and... (Where it's postulated that IBM has the largest total number of Macs in an Org (outside of Apple))
- sounds 12y agoNot exactly -- IBM is now mandating their internal systems support Macs (if the rumor is to be believed). Beside the obvious problems with having to push that top-down when IBM already has so many Apple devices, there's the problem that they're late on Apple support. They can't afford to continue to lag "the mobile revolution, which IBM has missed out on."