4 ms·
It is a matter of common sense. You can't reasonably control internet usage of teenager (and probably shouldn't). While 5yo is an avid user YouTube and google a
by indeyets 12y ago
It is a matter of common sense. You can't reasonably control internet usage of teenager (and probably shouldn't). While 5yo is an avid user YouTube and google and it is a good idea to filter things they can get to
- rurounijones 12y agoYou cannot try and refute an argument based on something that is not in the spec and is "common sense" since "common sense" is not a defined value for a spec that has global implications.
- indeyets 12y agoSpec shouldn't define what's good and what's not for your children. That's something for parent to decide. Spec defines a "tool" which can be used by parent who thinks it makes sense for them
- rurounijones 12y agoThen you cannot defend things as "It is meant for X year olds, not Y year olds" when someone decries the feature as easily bypassable.
- user24 12y agoI would say that the answer for the 5 year old scenario is supervision.
- indeyets 12y agosure. but having several layers of "defense" is still a good idea
- DanBC 12y agoI would freaking love it if Youtube had the sense to not serve adult adverts during obviously children's programming.