3 ms·
I think the idea isn't so much a porn filter as it is a "treat this user as a child" request. So, for example, social networking sites might work in restricted
by chc 12y ago
I think the idea isn't so much a porn filter as it is a "treat this user as a child" request. So, for example, social networking sites might work in restricted mode.
I do agree "prefer safe" is a very poor way of expressing that desire, though. Maybe "child-safe", but not just "safe", which implies a related but different idea.
- bostik 12y agoIf this takes off at all, I can see the sites reacting by altering the advertising group selection based on the presence of the header. "Cool, an under-10 browsing. Let's push all the autoplay toy videos we have in rotation." I already get the creeps from the toy ads squeezed between and in the middle of children's TV shows.