3 ms·

Yodlee is the service that took on the painful and expensive problem of actually building an engine that can securely store bank and brokerage passwords and use

Yodlee is the service that took on the painful and expensive problem of actually building an engine that can securely store bank and brokerage passwords and use them to scrape hundreds of different financial sites. They have a consumer front end. It's quite decent, actually, and it's free. Go to Yodlee.com and sign up. But they apparently make most of their money by (a) licensing their back end to services like Mint, and (b) serving as a kind of OEM for banks, who put up Yodlee's software rebranded as a part of the bank's website.

jaytee_clone 17y ago
That to me sounds like a better model than Mint. Sure Yodlee doesn't have the media buzz or "explosive" growth (Mint's growth didn't really impress me either.), but the infrastructure is extremely useful and will be around for a long time. If Mint is doing well, Yodlee is too. If Mint fails, Yodless will still have a diverse client base to support its business.
- abossy 17y ago
  > Mint's growth didn't really impress me either. Wow - if Mint's growth doesn't impress you, then what has? I felt their timing couldn't have been better. Their product matured as a recession hit and demand for money-saving financial services skyrocketed.
- run4yourlives 17y ago
  That to me sounds like a better model than Mint. Mint just received $170 million. Yodlee did not.
  - bmelton 17y ago
    But we don't know that Yodlee isn't doing 170M revenues a year either. Getting aquired and making money don't necessarily equate to each other in the most obvious ways. Youtube was a huge money sink, and got a huge acquisition. Mint is, I believe at least, somewhat profitable, and only got $170M. The timing had a lot more to do with it than anything, but as a consumer, I'm a LOT more likely to give money to Mint than Youtube, and the YouTube founders are arguably a lot richer than the Mint founders.
- jacquesm 17y ago
  Makes you wonder what would happen to Mint if Yodlee were to go south. What have the investors invested in ? A company that does not own its own core technology ?
  - mattmcknight 17y ago
    Intuit appears to have similar infrastructure, so they will likely move Mint.com off of Yodlee. Hopefully Mint used a modular design... ;-)
rg 17y ago
I have used Yodlee.com directly (and free) for two years; it has functioned extraordinarily well, and is invaluable--it saves hours of time dealing with personal finances, and provides very usable reports. I avoided Mint because I thought that Mint's very thin layer over Yodlee's services was apt to be an unstable business, and now we see that Mint users have been tossed to Intuit. I was also reluctant to expose all my financial details to Mint unnecessarily. Yodlee's own security credentials are high--good enough to convince just about all the large banks, brokerage houses, and credit issuers to trust them. Try a Yodlee account yourself, and you will see that Mint has been adding relatively little distinctive value over Yodlee's unique base.
netsp 17y ago
Someone should license front end to banks.

jaytee_clone 17y ago

That to me sounds like a better model than Mint. Sure Yodlee doesn't have the media buzz or "explosive" growth (Mint's growth didn't really impress me either.), but the infrastructure is extremely useful and will be around for a long time. If Mint is doing well, Yodlee is too. If Mint fails, Yodless will still have a diverse client base to support its business.

abossy 17y ago
> Mint's growth didn't really impress me either. Wow - if Mint's growth doesn't impress you, then what has? I felt their timing couldn't have been better. Their product matured as a recession hit and demand for money-saving financial services skyrocketed.
run4yourlives 17y ago
That to me sounds like a better model than Mint. Mint just received $170 million. Yodlee did not.
- bmelton 17y ago
  But we don't know that Yodlee isn't doing 170M revenues a year either. Getting aquired and making money don't necessarily equate to each other in the most obvious ways. Youtube was a huge money sink, and got a huge acquisition. Mint is, I believe at least, somewhat profitable, and only got $170M. The timing had a lot more to do with it than anything, but as a consumer, I'm a LOT more likely to give money to Mint than Youtube, and the YouTube founders are arguably a lot richer than the Mint founders.
jacquesm 17y ago
Makes you wonder what would happen to Mint if Yodlee were to go south. What have the investors invested in ? A company that does not own its own core technology ?
- mattmcknight 17y ago
  Intuit appears to have similar infrastructure, so they will likely move Mint.com off of Yodlee. Hopefully Mint used a modular design... ;-)

rg 17y ago

I have used Yodlee.com directly (and free) for two years; it has functioned extraordinarily well, and is invaluable--it saves hours of time dealing with personal finances, and provides very usable reports. I avoided Mint because I thought that Mint's very thin layer over Yodlee's services was apt to be an unstable business, and now we see that Mint users have been tossed to Intuit. I was also reluctant to expose all my financial details to Mint unnecessarily. Yodlee's own security credentials are high--good enough to convince just about all the large banks, brokerage houses, and credit issuers to trust them. Try a Yodlee account yourself, and you will see that Mint has been adding relatively little distinctive value over Yodlee's unique base.

netsp 17y ago

Someone should license front end to banks.