3 ms·
They could also decide to allow their devices to be unlocked in a secure way, instead of us having to rely on vulnerabilities, and then them having to fix them.
by higherpurpose 12y ago
They could also decide to allow their devices to be unlocked in a secure way, instead of us having to rely on vulnerabilities, and then them having to fix them.
- thethimble 12y agoDevil's advocate: perhaps Google is taking a loss on the $35 device in exchange for user lock-in? I doubt the immense R&D behind building it would have been worth it otherwise. I'm not arguing against unlimited freedom - just arguing against the expectation of unlimited freedom when all things are considered.