3 ms·
From the article: "400 septillion watts per second" ... And the context is talking about solar output, not a rate of change. Sigh.
by kimdouglasmason 12y ago
From the article:
"400 septillion watts per second"
... And the context is talking about solar output, not a rate of change.
Sigh.
- moreati 12y agoConsidering the source, I almost wish it was intentional - the science/engineering equivalent of a click bait headline.