4 ms·
Java and .NET are both OO functional languages that execute code in JIT compilers, but there are many differences. .NET has stronger patterns throughout the sy
by jdavid 19y ago
Java and .NET are both OO functional languages that execute code in JIT compilers, but there are many differences.
.NET has stronger patterns throughout the system, you basically learn one set of patterns and it works on everything. most developers support all of the patterns.
.NET has superior thread and memory management. in most tests i have seen, .NET code runs faster with less memory bulk and with better memory access models for most object calls.
.NET remoting is built in, while with Java you need external 3rd party Apps.
Visual Studio Blows Eclipse out of the water. I have yet to see a feature in Eclipse that was not first deployed in Visual Studio.
Visual Studio Team Edition, better supports 100,000 lines of code or more in revision control than any other platform, while remaining agile.
Microsoft has a long term support option if you plan to actually scale your product, Java on the other hand requires you to base your support options on the user community.
If you want to get access to the hardware layer for graphics, or communication, you can use the same tool set vertical, as you can to develop the rest of your code. With Java, if you want to do hardware, you need to break out of your development tools and use different ones.
.NET/ Visual Studio has framework language packages for C#, Visual Basic, Python, PHP, Ruby, C, C++, J#, JavaScript,
-and if we wanted to, we could write a framework package for ActionScript3 (yes we have considered it)
We love the .NET platform, but what we do not like is the server licensing fee. at $1000 a software license, we would rather amortize that cost based on uptime like a service, so that we could deploy an image on any number of computers, and pay for what we use. I have raised this concern with MS and how they do not fit well with EC2. For now we feel that MS will move along with their Novell relationship and Mono will become an extension platform for MS developers, with a service contract only.
- icky 19y ago> Java and .NET are both OO functional languages You keep saying that word... I do not think it means what you think it means.
- michaelneale 19y ago>You keep saying that word... I do not think it means what you think it means. Where does that quote come from?
- axod 19y agoYou don't know?? Inconceivable!
- icky 19y agoThe Princess Bride. http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0093779/ http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0093779/ Go watch it right now.
- michaelneale 19y agoAh I thought it was that. The "inconceivable" word wasn't it? yes, brilliant movie.
- plinkplonk 19y ago"Visual Studio Team Edition, better supports 100,000 lines of code or more in revision control than any other platform, while remaining agile. " What does this sentence mean exactly? I tried parsing it a few different ways and can't make out what is being said. i've worked on a few million line java programs using eclipse and Intellij and had no problems being "agile".
- mwerty 19y ago>I've worked on a few million line java programs using eclipse and Intellij and had no problems being "agile". For each of your million line programs, he's saying that VSTE better supports revision control than whatever you're using.
- plinkplonk 19y ago"or each of your million line programs, he's saying that VSTE better supports revision control than whatever you're using." aahh. I see. Thanks for parsing that for me ;-). It must be the "agile" word that threw me off track. If someone who's worked with VSTE can summarize why and how it is so much better, that would be educational . (I've never worked with VSTE , so anyone who has, please chime in)