3 ms·
I'm not saying it's useful to call sugar a poison, and I don't generally refer to it as one. I'm saying it fits the definitions I've seen of poison, and that ma
by Fishkins 12y ago
I'm not saying it's useful to call sugar a poison, and I don't generally refer to it as one. I'm saying it fits the definitions I've seen of poison, and that makes it literally a poison.
> Besides, sugar is the primary fuel for your brain; without sugar, we don't exist. It's a funny sort of poison that is necessary for our existence.
Arsenic, along with several other low-dose poisons, is also necessary for our existence[0]. Do you disagree it's a poison?
0 - http://www.chemicool.com/elements/arsenic.html http://www.chemicool.com/elements/arsenic.html
- judk 12y agoLet's stop being silly. No substance is or is not a poison. You have to talk about concentration and mass relative to everyday exposure when you claim something is poison.