6 ms·
And just like nobody actually thinks they are driving to fast to be safe, nobody would think that the jobs they provide would be abusive. Even long hours in a s
by KC8ZKF 12y ago
And just like nobody actually thinks they are driving to fast to be safe, nobody would think that the jobs they provide would be abusive. Even long hours in a sweatshop would be randized as providing opportunities in a free market.
- eglover 12y agoNo. You're turning a fallacy into a bumper sticker. First of all, speed limits are way below the capabilities of how safely cars can move today. Hence, the original federal law that said limits should represent the top 80th percentile of drivers. (That's obviously not used anymore.) Slow can mean dangerous, don't depend on obvious quips for all your thinking. Second, "sweatshops" in the derogatory sense only exist in socialist countries where families are starving to death trying to support the government. If kids didn't work, they wouldn't have food. You know very well they and their parents would prefer that school be an option. Third, the work that these companies provide are NOT inherently wrong. Making clothes? Sounds like a good skill to me. Don't base your "opinions" on some dark imagery you've developed in your head.