4 ms·
I've studied the history of the oil business, but my findings are totally different from yours. Look at the price history-- there is no 25 or 30 year cycle of
by pingswept 17y ago
I've studied the history of the oil business, but my findings are totally different from yours.
Look at the price history-- there is no 25 or 30 year cycle of crude oil crashes beyond the gap from 1979 to the mid-2000's. We can all confirm this for ourselves here:
http://www.inflationdata.com/inflation/images/charts/Oil/Inflation_Adj_Oil_Prices_Chart.htm http://www.inflationdata.com/inflation/images/charts/Oil/Inf...
and here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Oil_Prices_1861_2007.svg http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Oil_Prices_1861_2007.svg
You can see that the price stayed within a factor of 2 of its average price (around $20 in 2009 currency) for roughly 100 years. Furthermore, before World War I, coal was our primary energy source-- less than 20% of our global energy usage came from oil before 1920. To say that the oil industry has had the same drivers as it's changed from being just a source of kerosene to the primary world energy source is inaccurate.
Incidentally I do agree that "presupposing a [sic] impeding [sic] permanent shortfall in global hydrocarbon supplies" is likely to be a poor idea, but not for the reasons you state. I think it's a bad idea because the actual history of oil has been so unpredictable, so acyclic.