4 ms·
> There is nothing good in Backbone today frankly.It was one of the first successfull "clientside" framework AngularJS was released in 2009 [1], whereas Backbo
by ChrisAntaki 12y ago
> There is nothing good in Backbone today frankly.It was one of the first successfull "clientside" framework
AngularJS was released in 2009 [1], whereas Backbone was released a year later in 2010 [2].
[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AngularJS http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AngularJS
[2] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Backbone.js http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Backbone.js
- aikah 12y ago> AngularJS was released in 2009 [1], whereas Backbone was released a year later in 2010 [2]. Sure,that's why i said > It was one of the first successfull "clientside" framework Did you miss the word successfull or what? furthermore old angularjs looked more like Adobe Spry than current AngularJS,while Backbone hardly evolved(which is not good of course).
- ChrisAntaki 12y ago> while Backbone hardly evolved(which is not good of course) Backbone is a much simpler library than Angular. There's less of a need for it to evolve, since it's meant to be extended on a per project basis.
- aikah 12y agoI disagree totally.