It's not about heroes and villains. It's about right and wrong. You're more than welcome to fill in the blanks between right and wrong with mushy grey area, how

It's not about heroes and villains. It's about right and wrong. You're more than welcome to fill in the blanks between right and wrong with mushy grey area, however, some of us have higher moral standards and don't deem actions less wrong if the aggressor was "angered", or "ill". "What does it say to you that the father of the innocent victim blames the system first and the killer second?" It gives credence to my points. It shows the level to which people have been brainwashed/tricked into thinking that violence is "ok as long as there is some reason". This individual was able to justify and excuse a person violently murdering their loved one due to whatever circumstance. Rather than just calling it senseless violence and coincidence, and holding the violent individual at fault. At the end of the day. Someone chose to take another person's life. And all these people are pretending that's okay, or "less wrong". Circumstance, or not, this person made a willing choice and decision to take another person's life, to end it, forever. I hope everyone here let's that sink in, before they try talk about "mitigating factors".