3 ms·
Says who? If you believe the Supreme Court, calls to violence are core political speech (Brandenburg v. Ohio, NAACP v. Claiborne Hardware). I'm not even sure wh
by bcoates 12y ago
Says who? If you believe the Supreme Court, calls to violence are core political speech (Brandenburg v. Ohio, NAACP v. Claiborne Hardware). I'm not even sure what law distributing videos of murder would break.
- LukeShu 12y ago"Fighting words" are not protected speech (Chaplinsky v. New Hampshire). Calls to violence are generally not protected; though Brandenburg v. Ohio ruled that the call to violence must be likely to actually incite violence.
- JoeAltmaier 12y agoObscenity, right? That's not just about sex.