4 ms·
> syntactically cleaner in their implementations. Listen to yourself please. > lack of hygenic macros in CL Which lack? CL macros are usually very hygienic,
by mrottenkolber 12y ago
> syntactically cleaner in their implementations.
Listen to yourself please.
> lack of hygenic macros in CL
Which lack? CL macros are usually very hygienic, being a Lisp-2 and all, having GENSYM.
> I love CL, but it's helpful to remember its limitations.
What limitations? Not having syntactical things you seem to like and supporting non-hygienic macros are not limitations. Quite on the opposite, I believe these are features.