4 ms·
Good choice but I tried it but couldn't get on with it to be honest. That's just down to me, not the language though.
by allegory 12y ago
Good choice but I tried it but couldn't get on with it to be honest. That's just down to me, not the language though.
- mercurial 12y agoI'm not saying it's not clunky, but all in all it's fairly pragmatic. That said, I'm a big Python fan as well. Of all the dynamic languages I work/worked with, it's the one that tries hardest to be less of a footgun, and it has a strong tradition of decent documentation (hear, hear, OCaml library developers...).