4 ms·
It seems the consensus is to try and avoid them where possible: http://programmers.stackexchange.com/questions/53878/dynamic-vs-statically-typed-languages-for-
by CmonDev 12y ago
It seems the consensus is to try and avoid them where possible:
http://programmers.stackexchange.com/questions/53878/dynamic-vs-statically-typed-languages-for-websites http://programmers.stackexchange.com/questions/53878/dynamic...
http://programmers.stackexchange.com/questions/10032/dynamically-vs-statically-typed-languages-studies http://programmers.stackexchange.com/questions/10032/dynamic...
http://programmers.stackexchange.com/questions/246762/is-there-a-real-advantage-to-dynamic-languages?lq=1 http://programmers.stackexchange.com/questions/246762/is-the...
- mkesper 12y agoDepends on whom you ask, I'd say. These questions don't seem to be unbiased.
- djur 12y agoNone of those three links suggest a consensus against dynamically-typed languages. All of them feature highly-rated arguments in favor of such languages. How can you even begin to suggest a "consensus" from such a basis?