3 ms·

Although they still can give skin cancer, there aren't enough UV photons in sunlight to produce a worthwhile amount of power. Highly doubtful anyone serious wo

Although they still can give skin cancer, there aren't enough UV photons in sunlight to produce a worthwhile amount of power. Highly doubtful anyone serious would try to make this work with UV. Infrared, on the other hand, has some power production capability (though visible contains a much better resource). Even though we may only be looking at 0.3V (high wavelengths have low voltages), we might be getting a few amps with a square foot of this material. Makes a lot more sense than other PV-related window technologies. They're going to have to figure out how to cool the concentrator cells lest they cause adjacent construction materials to catch fire with how hot they run. (I^2R losses mean that these high current cells will be dumping a lot of heat per watt generated).

BrandonMarc 12y ago
Care to elaborate on the other pv-related window technologies? I'm curious. Last decade I followed news of XsunX and their Power Glass ... and it was like following news of flying cars, or returning to the moon: a continuous parade of stories, every single one saying "we're almost there, next year we'll really have it ready!" The concept of "Power Glass" was similar to the article here; the glass had tiny PV technology buried inside, with the idea that skyscrapers with their glass facades could generate their own power, along with any other building using lots of glass in its skin. I see XsunX no longer mentions Power Glass on their website [1]. Now it looks like any PV manufacturer. You have to go back 8 years in the Internet Archive to see it [2]. They were sure proud of this revolutionary technology ... 8 years ago. Oh well. At least flying cars are showing [3] progress [4]. [1] http://www.xsunx.com/ http://www.xsunx.com/ [2] https://web.archive.org/web/20060705005757/http://www.xsunx.com/ https://web.archive.org/web/20060705005757/http://www.xsunx.... [3] http://www.terrafugia.com/ http://www.terrafugia.com/ [4] http://mavericklsa.com/ http://mavericklsa.com/
- mchannon 12y ago
  Even though to the uninitiated it sounds like a no-brainer to cover windows with solar panels, it turns out that what makes a solar panel effective is that it converts the light to electricity and only lets through what it can't convert (which, sadly, tends to be what you can't see). Windows are useful because they let light through. Solar panels are useful because they don't. If you ended up with some sort of hybrid that let 50% of the visible through and absorbed 50% of the balance, it would not be a very good window (too dim or obstructed), and it would cost at least double what a comparable solar panel would cost (per watt). You'd also take some hits to aesthetics and efficiency (humans want reflective coatings on smooth window glass, solar cells want antireflective coatings on textured low-iron glass). Wiring up the windows would likewise add to the installation cost. Solar panels produce their rated power facing somewhere between up and south (in the northern hemisphere), and building windows almost never face in that direction, making for an ever bigger hit to performance. Installing panels on buildings can be a good idea, but not where the windows go. Rooftops and south-facing walls are about it.

BrandonMarc 12y ago

Care to elaborate on the other pv-related window technologies? I'm curious. Last decade I followed news of XsunX and their Power Glass ... and it was like following news of flying cars, or returning to the moon: a continuous parade of stories, every single one saying "we're almost there, next year we'll really have it ready!" The concept of "Power Glass" was similar to the article here; the glass had tiny PV technology buried inside, with the idea that skyscrapers with their glass facades could generate their own power, along with any other building using lots of glass in its skin. I see XsunX no longer mentions Power Glass on their website [1]. Now it looks like any PV manufacturer. You have to go back 8 years in the Internet Archive to see it [2]. They were sure proud of this revolutionary technology ... 8 years ago. Oh well. At least flying cars are showing [3] progress [4]. [1] http://www.xsunx.com/ http://www.xsunx.com/ [2] https://web.archive.org/web/20060705005757/http://www.xsunx.com/ https://web.archive.org/web/20060705005757/http://www.xsunx.... [3] http://www.terrafugia.com/ http://www.terrafugia.com/ [4] http://mavericklsa.com/ http://mavericklsa.com/

mchannon 12y ago
Even though to the uninitiated it sounds like a no-brainer to cover windows with solar panels, it turns out that what makes a solar panel effective is that it converts the light to electricity and only lets through what it can't convert (which, sadly, tends to be what you can't see). Windows are useful because they let light through. Solar panels are useful because they don't. If you ended up with some sort of hybrid that let 50% of the visible through and absorbed 50% of the balance, it would not be a very good window (too dim or obstructed), and it would cost at least double what a comparable solar panel would cost (per watt). You'd also take some hits to aesthetics and efficiency (humans want reflective coatings on smooth window glass, solar cells want antireflective coatings on textured low-iron glass). Wiring up the windows would likewise add to the installation cost. Solar panels produce their rated power facing somewhere between up and south (in the northern hemisphere), and building windows almost never face in that direction, making for an ever bigger hit to performance. Installing panels on buildings can be a good idea, but not where the windows go. Rooftops and south-facing walls are about it.