4 ms·
No, "the court ruled 8 to 1 that such an intrusive search without the threat of a clear danger to other students violated the Constitution's protections against
by joshfraser 12y ago
No, "the court ruled 8 to 1 that such an intrusive search without the threat of a clear danger to other students violated the Constitution's protections against unreasonable search or seizure".
How would her having illegal drugs be a clear danger to other students?
- wdewind 12y agoNo what? Nothing I said disagrees with that. Can we go back to the part where you explain how scanners at airports are a "blatant violation of our Constitutional rights"?