3 ms·

But djbdns has had security issues in the past? http://maradns.samiam.org/DNS.security.comparison.txt http://maradns.samiam.org/DNS.security.comparison.txt

• tptacek 12y ago
  Nope.
  • ck2 12y ago
    Am I missing something? http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2012-1191 http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2012-1191 http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2009-0858 http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2009-0858 http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2008-4392 http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2008-4392 It just has the fewest. But they still popup from time to time.
    • tedunangst 12y ago
      dnscache is not the authoritative server. The link in your previous comment even mentioned this explicitly.
    • tptacek 12y ago
      None of these are meaningful. BIND has a long and illustrious history of coughing up shells to attackers. Any nameserver written in C and not written by Bernstein has a high hurdle to clear.