3 ms·
A new version number. Seriously. Most people would be happy if he pushed the code up unchanged but with a new version number just so they can feel like the pr
by McDiesel 12y ago
A new version number. Seriously.
Most people would be happy if he pushed the code up unchanged but with a new version number just so they can feel like the project is fresh again... its not about features, its about having a shiny new version number to look at... like most software.
IMO, im still using ST2, because frankly 3 didnt bring enough new to the table...
- ariejan 12y agoBasically you're suggesting a six-monthly release cycle is used (like Ubuntu). Maybe not all that many changes, but a shiny new release to talk about every 6 months.
- adultSwim 12y agoAgreed. I've heard a big demand for a new version but haven't heard requests for many features. Bug fixes are obviously good. I don't think a mature editor should need constant development. Think about the major release cycle for something like emacs.