I skimmed it. One thing that caught my attention is the so-called "RA": Prior to voting, voters must communicate their intent to participate with a Reg

I skimmed it. One thing that caught my attention is the so-called "RA": Prior to voting, voters must communicate their intent to participate with a Registration Authority (RA). Nowhere is it discussed what exactly is the RA, who is part of it etc. Moderators are supposedly "randomly" chosen and given a random amount of time to do their job, but Reputation influences moderator selection. Relatively high positive reputation increases the odds of selection while negative reputation decreases it. This positive contributor bias aims to contain the influence of special interest groups. That's not random and leaves space to game the system. I think giving more moderating time to higher rep would be better than choosing moderators from a small pool of users.