3 ms·

Me too. Even though I'm an die hard fan of the Emacs ideas on extensiblity (which is more similar to Github's Atom) speed and good defaults have to come first,

• gerbal 12y ago
  Also being available everywhere. I like Text Mate quite a bit, but being single platform makes it harder to recommend.
  • josteink 12y ago
    > Also being available everywhere. Emacs is everywhere. Windows. Linux. GUIed. And in a terminal where I've SSHed into a remote host. TextMate? Nope. Sublime text? Nope. Atom? Nope. LightTable? No chance. These modern GUI-only editors is IMO a major step back considering the Unix-y audience they are targeting: Any decent Unix-editor needs to work on my console. No exceptions.
    • hollerith 12y ago
      >Any decent Unix-editor needs to work on my console. Not everyone feels that way. For example, I used Emacs in text mode for over 15 years, but now that I have tried editing text in a GUI, I do not ever want to go back.
      • peatmoss 12y ago
        Not everyone feels that way, but enough people feel that way. I rarely use vi or emacs in a terminal these days, but I don't see a good reason to take the retrograde step back to a GUI-only editor. Also, network access isn't equivalent to console-accessible for quite a few use cases--fixing networking on the target box for starters.
    • swah 12y ago
      And I don't see anyone teaching how you write an editor with multiple front-ends! People normally start with the front-end.