> Are you suggesting that python is more complex to use than x86_64 assembler? No, but twisted is much more complicated than regular python. The inversion of c

> Are you suggesting that python is more complex to use than x86_64 assembler? No, but twisted is much more complicated than regular python. The inversion of control and the fact that until quite recently it was almost impossible to write code for using the framework that was easy to read/understand by experienced python ciders who were not familiar with the idims and conventions used by the project. Twisted generates more WTFs per minute than any other bit of python kit. Some of this is due to a tradition of poor documentation within the project and some due to the nature of the code. Twisted is a complicated system, and sometimes this complexity is not worth embracing.