3 ms·
I won't pretend to understand how patents work, or comment on the general absurdity of the claim overall, but it did strike me as peculiar that Facebook would a
by scoot 12y ago
I won't pretend to understand how patents work, or comment on the general absurdity of the claim overall, but it did strike me as peculiar that Facebook would attempt to claim ownership of the invention of (this embodiment of) a 'composite image' that can (with evidence you kindly provided) be attribute to members of reddit.
Also, I can only assume Facebook's patent lawyers charge by the word!
- scoot 12y ago(And bravo on the troll-face image! The irony will not be lost should this patent be granted and FB attempt to assert it...)
- DSMan195276 12y agoTo be fair, they didn't attempt to claim to invent the 'composite image'. While there is a picture of a composite image and it is mentioned in the description, nothing about composite images is in the claims. The claims themselves seem to be specifically about using a text identifier on a social-network messaging system to display in-line images. The composite image figure is simply an example of multiple in-line images used together in a single message. This is also just an application, so there's no guarantee the claims will stay the same before it is accepted (If it ever is) That said, I'm not a patent lawyer so take that with as much salt as you want.